Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- qt:qt_ide_options [2011/12/03 18:24] – mithat
+++ qt:qt_ide_options [2011/12/03 18:25] – mithat
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Qt IDE options ======
-Unless otherwise noted, stuff below is based on experiments done in the late spring of 2011 on Debian and/or Ubuntu.
+Unless otherwise noted, stuff below is based on experiments done in the late spring of 2011 on Debian and/or Ubuntu. I'm not considering KDE-based and Windows-only solutions. The focus below is on C++ development because it is Qt's native binding. Some Python thoughts are sprinkled in as well though.
   * [[#Qt Creator]]
@@ Line 9: / Line 10: @@
   * [[#QDevelop]]
   * [[#HaiQ]]
-Note: I'm not considering KDE-based and Windows-only solutions. I may not consider GTK-only solutions as well. The focus below is on C++ development because it is Qt's native binding. Some Python thoughts are sprinkled in as well though.
 Executive summary as of the moment: Despite its UI quirks and C++ only support, Qt Creator is the way to go for C++ development. Netbeans with C/C++/Fortran isn't bad, but the odd project structure and PITA template creation is off-putting. Monkey Studio would/will be a credible alternative if/when debugging support improves (adding templates is easy).