Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- qt:netbeans_c_c_fortran [2011/04/06 19:40] – [The cons] mithat
+++ qt:netbeans_c_c_fortran [2011/04/07 14:38] (current) – [The pros] mithat
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
   * //Automated package building in tar, deb, etc. formats(!)//
   * Pretty [[http://netbeans.org/kb/docs/cnd/profiling-tools.html|profiling]]
-  * It's Netbeans--it won't become abandonware. (But the C/C++/Fortran support is less guaranteed.)
+    * But I've had trouble getting it going
+  * It's Netbeans--it won't become abandonware.
+    * But the C/C++/Fortran support is less guaranteed.)
 ===== The cons =====
@@ Line 26: / Line 28: @@
   * Adding custom project templates (which would solve the above issue) doesn't seem to be an easy task.
   * By default Netbeans opens a terminal shell when you debug projects and the debugger sees warnings (I think) -- but it does not automatically dispose of it when you are done. Fortunately, you can make this go away by setting the project options to use the internal terminal or output pane.
+===== Thoughts =====
+In spite of the quirks, this seems to be a credible platform. It needs a good "Qt Application" project template. PyQt support is theoretically there but needs work, possibly consisting only of a "PyQt Application" project template and "Qt Form" and "Qt Dialog" file templates