Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- qt:monkey_studio [2011/04/05 13:08] – mithat
+++ qt:monkey_studio [2011/04/07 14:35] (current) – [TODO] mithat
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 [[http://www.monkeystudio.org/|Monkey Studio]] is a Qt-centric IDE and supports Qt projects in a number of languages. It seems to be well thought out with the exception of a couple things.
-First, rather than using the standard GDB debugger, it uses [[http://code.google.com/p/beaverdbg/|Beaver Debugger]]--a wrapper for GDB stripped out of Qt Creator. A Beaver Debugger is available for OS X and Windows, but there is no package available for Linux, either in the Debian repos or from the authors.
+First, rather than using the standard GDB debugger directly, it uses [[http://code.google.com/p/beaverdbg/|Beaver Debugger]]--a wrapper for GDB stripped out of Qt Creator. A Beaver Debugger is available for OS X and Windows, but there is no package available for Linux, either in the Debian repos or from the authors.
-Second, there is no template to make a Qt project with a form based on a *.ui-file. I'm pretty sure it's not a big deal to create such a template, but it would be nice if it existed by default. Starting with a Qt GUI project and then adding a Qt Form to it is a tedious and (at least for the one time I tried it) error-prone process.
+Second, there is no template to make a Qt project with a form based on a *.ui-file. I'm pretty sure it's not a big deal to create such a template, but it would be nice if it existed by default. Starting with a Qt GUI project and then adding a Qt Form to it is a tedious and (at least for the one time I tried it) error-prone process. This is easily ameliorated with a {{:qt:qt_application.zip|new template}}.
 The integrated Qt Designer is well done. That along with support for lots of languages (including Python) makes this an appealing option. The fact that it's C++-based means it starts up pretty quickly (an issue with the Java-based IDEs). Hoping that Beaver support improves.
+===== Pros =====
+  * Really good integration of Qt Designer
+  * Very fast
+  * Multi-language support
+  * Project file structure and ''*.pro'' files seem to be compatible with Qt Creator
+===== Cons =====
+  * No available template for a project in the style of Qt Creator or Netbeans Qt. (I've {{:qt:qt_application.zip|made one}} though.)
+  * Debugger seems to be a Frankenstein from Qt Creator and is [[https://code.google.com/p/beaverdbg/|"frozen and waits for a new enthusiastic maintainer."]]
+  * No apparent toolbar item for "Run" or "Debug". You can however assign keyboard shortcuts.
+  * No profiling
+  * Untested code completion
 ===== TODO =====
   * Add Beaver Debugger via PPA and see how well it works
-  * Creatd a **QMake GUI Project** template that is bare-bones but makes adding forms somewhat straightforward (ala Netbeans)
+===== Thoughts =====
+Lack of debugging makes this less than appealing for serious work. Debugging is not available at all for PyQt projects--in spite of the good PyQt templates, etc. I really hope to see this IDE develop.