Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- programming_general:object-orientation_fundamentals [2020/11/15 00:01] – [Why object-orientation?] mithat
+++ programming_general:object-orientation_fundamentals [2020/11/15 00:02] – [Why object-orientation?] mithat
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 In object-oriented thinking, you start with, "What are the components (i.e., objects) that make up the problem?" Once you identify those, you then ask, "How do they behave?" and then, "How do the components interact?" So, the modularity in object-oriented thinking derives primarily from the "nouns" in the system.
-You can //analyze// and //design// applications using this //object-oriented// perspective and then implement the design in any language. However, the implementation is made //much// easier and more robust when the language has the necessary support for defining and using objects. Such a language is an **object-oriented language**.
+You can //analyze// and //design// your problem using this //object-oriented// perspective and then implement the design in any language. However, the implementation is made //much// easier and more robust when the language has the necessary support for defining and using objects. Such a language is an **object-oriented language**.
 So, OOAD facilitates a higher level of modular thinking. And, especially with an object-oriented language, it allows for very effective project management of large applications.