Mithat Konar (the wiki)

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: Mithat Konar (the wiki) » Programming Fundamentals with Processing » Places to Put Things
programming_fundamentals_with_processing:ch03-places-to-put-things

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
programming_fundamentals_with_processing:ch03-places-to-put-things [2017/07/26 17:57] – [Outputting variables] mithatprogramming_fundamentals_with_processing:ch03-places-to-put-things [2017/07/26 18:02] – [Processing's composite types] mithat
Line 133: Line 133:
 Knowing these rules, we could rewrite ''%%variables3a.pde%%'' as follows: Knowing these rules, we could rewrite ''%%variables3a.pde%%'' as follows:
  
-**program ''%%variables3a.pde%%'':** +<file java variables3a.pde>
- +
-<code java>+
 void setup () { void setup () {
   int var_one;   int var_one;
Line 145: Line 143:
   rect(0, 0, var_two, var_one);   rect(0, 0, var_two, var_one);
 } }
-</code>+</file>
 or, or,
  
-**program ''%%variables3b.pde%%'':** +<file java variables3b.pde>
- +
-<code java>+
 void setup () { void setup () {
   int rec_width;   int rec_width;
Line 160: Line 156:
   rect(0, 0, rec_width, rec_height);   rect(0, 0, rec_width, rec_height);
 } }
-</code>+</file> 
 The only difference in the the three versions of the program is the names we have given to the variables; the programs are functionally identical. However, of the three versions a lot of programmers would probably prefer ''%%variables3b.pde%%'' because the variables' names actually describe what they are used for--they are **descriptive identifiers**. Using descriptive identifiers isn't a language rule--you are free to use descriptive identifiers or not. However, they make reading and understanding your code much easier. And the easier your code is to read, the easier it will be for someone (even you) to fix and expand it. The only difference in the the three versions of the program is the names we have given to the variables; the programs are functionally identical. However, of the three versions a lot of programmers would probably prefer ''%%variables3b.pde%%'' because the variables' names actually describe what they are used for--they are **descriptive identifiers**. Using descriptive identifiers isn't a language rule--you are free to use descriptive identifiers or not. However, they make reading and understanding your code much easier. And the easier your code is to read, the easier it will be for someone (even you) to fix and expand it.
  
 Closely related to this are **coding conventions**--mutually agreed upon standard practices for writing code. Coding conventions are not rules; rather they are standard practices that have emerged over time and/or have been agreed upon ahead of time by a team of programmers. A common coding convention for variable names in Processing is to use CamelCase (i.e., capitalizing the first letter of adjacent words) with the first letter of the first word in lower case. Rewriting the example we have been working with so far using the CamelCase convention would yield: Closely related to this are **coding conventions**--mutually agreed upon standard practices for writing code. Coding conventions are not rules; rather they are standard practices that have emerged over time and/or have been agreed upon ahead of time by a team of programmers. A common coding convention for variable names in Processing is to use CamelCase (i.e., capitalizing the first letter of adjacent words) with the first letter of the first word in lower case. Rewriting the example we have been working with so far using the CamelCase convention would yield:
  
-**program ''%%variables3c.pde%%'':** +<file java variables3c.pde>
- +
-<code java>+
 void setup () { void setup () {
   int recWidth;   int recWidth;
Line 177: Line 172:
   rect(0, 0, recWidth, recHeight);   rect(0, 0, recWidth, recHeight);
 } }
-</code> +</file> 
-An alternative convention (used in program ''%%variables3b.pde%%'') might be to use all lower case letters for variable names and use the underscore character to separate words. I personally prefer this to CamelCase because I think it's easier to read. However, CamelCase is the defacto standard with Processing and what I will use in the remainder of this text.+ 
 +An alternative convention (used in program ''%%variables3b.pde%%'') might be to use all lower case letters for variable names and use the underscore character to separate words. CamelCase is the defacto standard with Processing and what I will use in the remainder of this text.
  
 ===== Data types ===== ===== Data types =====
Line 317: Line 313:
  
  
----- +<WRAP center round box 80%>
 === Geek break: Why doesn't this stuff happen automatically? === === Geek break: Why doesn't this stuff happen automatically? ===
  
Line 328: Line 323:
  
 These might seem like small issues when you are just starting programming, but you quickly learn to appreciate them when your programs become longer and more complex. These might seem like small issues when you are just starting programming, but you quickly learn to appreciate them when your programs become longer and more complex.
 +</WRAP>
  
- 
----- 
  
 ===== Syntactic sugar ===== ===== Syntactic sugar =====
programming_fundamentals_with_processing/ch03-places-to-put-things.txt · Last modified: 2017/07/26 18:06 by mithat
Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki