User Tools

Site Tools


messaging_candidates:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
messaging_candidates:start [2017/06/30 18:05] – [TextSecure] mithatmessaging_candidates:start [2017/06/30 18:08] – [Requirements] mithat
Line 5: Line 5:
 ===== Requirements ===== ===== Requirements =====
  
-The starting point in candidate selection is the [[https://www.eff.org/secure-messaging-scorecard|EFF's Secure Messaging Scorecard]] (as of 14 July 2015). From that list, only entries that have at most one red mark are considered.+The starting point in candidate selection is the now obsolete [[https://www.eff.org/secure-messaging-scorecard|EFF's Secure Messaging Scorecard]] (as of 14 July 2015). From that list, only entries that have at most one red mark are considered.
  
 In addition, the ideal candidate will: In addition, the ideal candidate will:
Line 81: Line 81:
 ===== Recommendation ===== ===== Recommendation =====
  
-The only platform that comes close to a recommendation is Telegram. But its use of your phone number as the primary source for identification and its clunky use of usernames makes an enthusiastic recommendation difficult. +Tox needs a more complete evaluation, but on the surface it is encouraging. Telegram comes close to a recommendation, but the questions surrounding its encryption, its use of your phone number as the primary source for identificationand its clunky use of usernames makes an enthusiastic recommendation difficult.
  
messaging_candidates/start.txt · Last modified: 2017/06/30 18:14 by mithat

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki