Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- kicad:kicad_spice_quick_guide [2017/02/25 20:51] – [What you'll need] mithat
+++ kicad:kicad_spice_quick_guide [2018/10/17 14:56] (current) – [Quick Guide to Using KiCad for SPICE Simulation] mithat
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Quick Guide to Using KiCad for SPICE Simulation ======
+<WRAP center important 60%>
+The following was written for KiCad 4. Simulation support in KiCad 5 has been reworked to such an extent that a lot of the following doesn't work.
+If you have KiCad 4 SPICE stuff you'd like to use in KiCad 5, have a look [[kicad:using_arbitrary_spice_engines_in_kicad_5|here]].
+</WRAP>
 {{:kicad:kicad-spice.png?direct&400|}}
@@ Line 12: / Line 19: @@
     * [[https://www.gnu.org/software/gnucap/|gnucap]]: Not actually SPICE but tries to be syntax-compatible.
     * [[http://www.spiceopus.si/|SpiceOpus]]: Proprietary but nice, especially the output plotting.
-    * [[http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/|LTSpice]]: Linear Technology's popular, proprietary Windows solution. Works in [[http://www.winehq.org/|Wine]]. Has a GUI anyway, so ... ? Whether it's scritable needs to be verified.
+    * [[http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/|LTSpice]]: Linear Technology's popular, proprietary Windows solution. Works in [[http://www.winehq.org/|Wine]]. It's scriptable but I have yet to understand how to embed control statements. Has a GUI anyway, so ... ?
     * [[http://www.cadence.com/products/orcad/pspice_simulation/Pages/default.aspx|PSpice]]: Windows-only, expensive, defacto standard professional solution in the USA. They also have a tradition of making available a //gratis// crippleware student version. And introducing non-standard model features, leading to an annoying situation where vendor-supplied models only work in PSPICE. Also has a a GUI, so ... ?
     * Any others?