electronic_music:softsynth_rabbit_hole
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
electronic_music:softsynth_rabbit_hole [2023/07/21 14:05] – [Laptops systems] mithat | electronic_music:softsynth_rabbit_hole [2023/07/22 20:06] (current) – [MicroDexed] mithat | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
====== Linux ====== | ====== Linux ====== | ||
- | I love Linux, so this is the obvious place to start for me. That said, using Linux for music looks like a PITA compared to other OSes, mostly owing to the audio subsystem. | + | I love Linux, so this is the obvious place to start for me. That said, using Linux for music looks like a PITA compared to other OSes, mostly owing to the audio subsystem. |
- | Another concern is latency. How bad will it be for live performance, | + | Another concern is latency. How bad will it be for live performance, |
- | Yet another concern is reliability of the hardware | + | Yet another concern is reliability of the hardware. Of particular concern are laptops, because there are so many potential points of failure. An SBC-based platform arguably can be more easily hardened. But that even that will take a lot of effort to get you to the same standards as a commercial standalone synth. |
- | In terms of software, there seem to be two basic approaches: Install a standalone synth that doesn' | + | In terms of software, there seems to be two basic approaches: Install a standalone synth that doesn' |
In terms of hardware, there are also two approaches: use a laptop or use a Rasperry Pi (or potentially other SBC).((Of course you can use a desktop computer instead of a laptop, but it makes portability a royal hassle, and that totally poops on its usefulness as a performance tool.)) | In terms of hardware, there are also two approaches: use a laptop or use a Rasperry Pi (or potentially other SBC).((Of course you can use a desktop computer instead of a laptop, but it makes portability a royal hassle, and that totally poops on its usefulness as a performance tool.)) | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
- | * [[https:// | + | * [[https:// |
+ | | ||
===== Laptop systems ===== | ===== Laptop systems ===== | ||
- | In addition to the laptop, you'll need an outboard USB soundcard, unless you lappy' | + | In addition to a laptop, you'll need an outboard USB soundcard, unless you lappy' |
Concerning latency, distributions with realtime kernels exist. The most popular is probably [[https:// | Concerning latency, distributions with realtime kernels exist. The most popular is probably [[https:// | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Ubuntu Studio is appealing because it's a turnkey solution. Debian with a realtime kernel is appealing because you don't need to deal with Ubuntu Snaps. There are likely other distributions that offer realtime kernels (either standard or as an option) as well. Feel free to explore these in your copious free time. | Ubuntu Studio is appealing because it's a turnkey solution. Debian with a realtime kernel is appealing because you don't need to deal with Ubuntu Snaps. There are likely other distributions that offer realtime kernels (either standard or as an option) as well. Feel free to explore these in your copious free time. | ||
- | Follow the fork in the hole: [[electronic_music: | + | To follow this fork in the hole, read [[electronic_music: |
===== Rasperry Pi ===== | ===== Rasperry Pi ===== | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Another advantage is being able to use a decent on-board I2S DAC. It's also more easily bundled into a tight package with a USB DAC if using an on-board I2S dac isn't suitable. Whether it makes most sense to use an on-board I2S DAC or a USB DAC is mostly down to whichever has the least latency. | Another advantage is being able to use a decent on-board I2S DAC. It's also more easily bundled into a tight package with a USB DAC if using an on-board I2S dac isn't suitable. Whether it makes most sense to use an on-board I2S DAC or a USB DAC is mostly down to whichever has the least latency. | ||
- | Most online guides assume you're using [[https:// | + | Most online guides assume you're using [[https:// |
- | [[https:// | + | [[https:// |
There are a [[https:// | There are a [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | To follow this fork in the hole, read [[electronic_music: | ||
====== Microcontroller-based and turnkey SBC synths ====== | ====== Microcontroller-based and turnkey SBC synths ====== | ||
Line 56: | Line 58: | ||
===== MiniDexed ===== | ===== MiniDexed ===== | ||
- | [[https:// | + | [[https:// |
===== MicroDexed ===== | ===== MicroDexed ===== | ||
[[https:// | [[https:// | ||
- | This could form the basis of a very compact and robust synth. However, | + | This could form the basis of a very compact and robust synth. However, |
- | MicroDexed-touch is billed as the continuation of MicroDexed, but it adds features that distract from the performance-synth goal. | + | MicroDexed-touch is billed as the continuation of MicroDexed. It adds features |
===== Other Teensy synths ===== | ===== Other Teensy synths ===== |
electronic_music/softsynth_rabbit_hole.1689948331.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/07/21 14:05 by mithat