Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- arduino:displays_for_classic_arduinos:1.8_and_1.44_tft_displays_and_classic_arduinos [2018/01/28 04:33] – mithat
+++ arduino:displays_for_classic_arduinos:1.8_and_1.44_tft_displays_and_classic_arduinos [2018/01/28 06:16] – mithat
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 The results are a bit of a disappointment because the displays are otherwise incredibly charming.
-===== Libraries =====
+===== Tests =====
-These are the libraries I know of that let you interface to a ST7735-based display. My tests were conducted with a 3.3V 8 MHz Arduino Pro Mini equivalent unless noted and a 1.44" (128x128) display that I bought through eBay from a vendor in China.
+I ran a number of tests using all the libraries I know of that let you interface to a ST7735-based display. These tests were conducted with a 3.3V 8 MHz Arduino Pro Mini equivalent unless noted and a 1.44" (128x128) display that I bought through eBay from a vendor in China.
 ==== Ucglib ====
@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 === Transparent font rendering ===
-{{youtube>GXLEwPskvls?560x315&rel=0}}
+{{youtube>CgSVboteLI8?560x315&rel=0}}
 {{youtube>ALPgbvUr6Ao?560x315&rel=0}}
@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 When a large fancy font is used, the performance between the Adafruit library and Uclib narrows. I suspect that with a font as large as that used in the Uclib examples, the results would be close to identical. Which is to say, not fast (or light?) enough.
-FIXME video
+{{youtube>6VZFaBHWOzE?560x315&rel=0}}
 [[display_st7735_1.44_adafruit_st7735_fonts.ino | source code]]